SFUSOCA
  • Home
  • About SOCA
    • History of SOCA
    • Executive Team >
      • Execs 2021/22
      • Execs 2020/21
      • Execs 2019/20
      • Execs 2018/19
    • Governance >
      • Partnership >
        • SSA Execs 2019/20
        • Agreements with Partners
        • Sub-Associations and Partners >
          • SFU Somali Students Association >
            • SSA Election
          • SFU Nigerian Students Association
          • African Student Association (Partner)
    • Contact Us
  • Gallery
  • Programs & Advocacy
    • Peer Check Program
    • Walk with our Elders
    • Black Study Hall
    • Student Exchange
    • SOCA Events
    • Advocacy & Campaigns
  • Meetings & Events
    • Minutes & Agenda
  • Resources
    • SOCA Black Student Support Centre - SUB 1430
    • SOCA Black Student Support Staff
    • Library
    • Archives >
      • Past Campaigns >
        • Space Campaign Updates
  • Get Involved
    • Sign Up
    • Volunteer
    • Donate to SOCA
    • Election >
      • By-Elections Fall 2022 >
        • Election 2022/23

Space Campaign Blog

Updates over the Course of the Campaign for Space

3/4/2021

0 Comments

 

Past Updates

August 24, 2018 : SOCA Email to SFSS - PDF

Sep 2 - SOCA Letter to SFU Administration - PDF​​

Sep 5
 - Student groups blast SFU student union over eviction from meeting spaces - BC | Globalnews.ca

FNSA Statement to the Public 
- Link


Sep 14: SOCA AND SFPIRG JOINT STATEMENT - Link 

SYNOPSIS OF SOCA AND SITUATION - PDF


Global News Article 
- https://globalnews.ca/news/4430261/sfu-student-clubs/

SOCA Message to Followers -  Message

SUB Architectural Report - PDF

Timeline - LINK

SOCA Overview and Calls to Action - PDF

Problematic April 5th Meeting-  Link

Overarching Problems - LINK

#SAVESOCA Banner - PDF

Sep 9, 2018 - Board Shorts: a recap of the rotunda space discussion | The Peak (the-peak.ca)

SFSS Email to SOCA: November 23 - Link

SOCA Space Update December 13 -  Link

SOCA Pamphlet Synopsis - PDF​

Jan 13 SOCA Email to SFSS - PDF 

Feb 4. 2019 - “The need for safe space”: SOCA publishes letter on ongoing space conflict 

Feb 25, 2019 - SFU’s SOCA discusses the significance of Black spaces | The Peak (the-peak.ca)

See Students Plan for the SUB - PDF

SOCA Flyer Primer - PDF

June 9, 2019 - SFSS president proposes new SUB model to give permanent space to Rotunda groups

Nov 6, 2020 - Board rejects motion to house CJSF, Embark, SFPIRG, and SOCA in the SUB 7–5

Nov 11, 2019 - SFSS not housing Rotunda groups in SUB

Nov 22, 2019 - Silent Protest - link

Jan 6, 2020 SFSS Council condemns SFSS Board of Directors decision to not house Rotunda groups 

March 2, 2020 - Rotunda groups will be offered space in the new Student Union Building 

March 6, 2020 - The Rotunda groups have won their space and that’s something we can all smile about

Dec 22, 2020 - MOU Between SFSS and SOCA Signed- PDF


Historical:


July 1, 2013 We need to preserve the Rotunda community when building the SUB | The Peak (the-peak.ca)

SFU SOCA archives submitted - https://bit.ly/SFUSOCAArchive2020

SUB Space Timeline and Fact Sheet (Credit to Marie Haddad): PDF

Rotunda Space Campaign Timeline (SFPIRG Annual Report): Link

0 Comments

Victory! After years of fighting, the Board votes to offer space to the Rotunda Community! Thank you

4/4/2020

0 Comments

 
9 MAR 2020 — After two years of fighting eviction, SOCA is happy to announce that we are in the final stages of our efforts to have a safe space for Black folks on campus.

Thank you to all members and allies supporting our cause.
--------
Afia Poku, SOCA President:
“It is a relief for SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry that the two-year battle to save Black space on campus has ended. Securing operational space is an assurance of our longevity, allowing us to continue building a sense of community on and off campus. Black space is vital for connecting students navigating experiences unique to Black students.”

“While Configuration 3 is a compromise for all parties involved, we are grateful that this is still collective growth in square footage for both of SOCA and Embark.

“We truly appreciate our members and allies who have advocated with us since 2018, or joined to support in the activism along the way.”
0 Comments

Jan 16, 2019 - SOCA to SFSS

1/21/2019

0 Comments

 
0 Comments

SOCA to Followers -  Dec 13

1/21/2019

1 Comment

 
Hello SOCA Followers and Supporters,
We have some positive news regarding our current space campaign. After multiple months of advocacy and campaigning against SFSS’ harmful decision to evict us on December 14, 2018, we have successfully got the eviction delayed to when the lease of the current space ends. This means that we will be housed in the Rotunda space until the new Student Union is built. This is very good and we could not have done this without the support of everyone.
However, the work is not yet done! We have previously and continuously asked the Simon Fraser Student Society to meet with the Rotunda Community regarding long term space for all the groups being evicted in the new Student Union Building. After they had previously committed to being more transparent with the Rotunda Community as well as previous admissions that the current model is unworkable, The SFSS has rejected our invitation to meet and has doubled down on their decision that will inexplicably block us from having a continuing space in campus. This action by the SFSS to continuously make decisions affecting us, without having us at the table is continuing the harmful adverse effects on our membership and a direct blow to our advocacy efforts of creating a space for anti-racism education and healing.
This means that we require continued support of our members, followers and supporters to continue advocating on our behalf in our campaign for a long term dedicated safe space on campus. This is important and we would love for you to attend the meetings of the SFSS Board of Directors and call on them to at least meet with the Rotunda Community. Sign our petition and continue to write letters of support on behalf of the SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry outlining the importance of having safe spaces for black students on this campus as have been the case since 1997.
#BlackSpacesMatter #NothingAboutUsWithoutUs #SAVESOCA
In Solidarity and Rage
The Executive Team
SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry

​
1 Comment

The SFU First Nations Student Association (FNSA) issues this public statement in the form of an open letter regarding the fraught relationship and interactions between the Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) and the FNSA.

9/21/2018

0 Comments

 
The SFU First Nations Student Association (FNSA) issues this public statement in the form of an open letter regarding the fraught relationship and interactions between the Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) and the FNSA.
[Image description - letter with First Nations Student Association letterhead with statement which reads -
"September 21, 2018
To all concerned,
The First Nations Student Association (FNSA) at Simon Fraser University has moved to go public with our concerns regarding the conduct of Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS).
It may seem that our response has been delayed as our allies, Simon Fraser Public Interest Research Group (SFPIRG) and the Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry (SOCAA), have previously issued public statements. Due to the circumstances surrounding our negotiations and communications with SFSS, our ability to maintain communication with our larger membership over the summer was limited. The FNSA is based on values of consensus and consultation with our whole membership. Our council, who maintained dialogue with the SFSS over the summer, did not want to speak for our membership without hearing their feedback or concerns.
Now that our membership and council have had the chance to discuss, we have agreed that our treatment by SFSS has been problematic, to say the least, and our attempts to reconcile with their board and leadership have been met with resistance and bad faith for years. We hope that our struggle will continue to reveal SFSS’s disregard for the wellbeing of SFU’s marginalized communities - in particular, its students of colour.
Some examples of mistreatment from SFSS are as follows:
- SFSS has negotiated with the FNSA in bad faith and has avoided consultation with regards to the new Student Union Building (SUB). 
- By withholding space in the new SUB, SFSS has denied Indigenous students a consistent, safe space to gather. This denial of space has compromised our ability to succeed academically and maintain our mental, physical, and spiritual health.
- SFSS has repeatedly demonstrated resistance to taking up principles of cultural competency.
- SFSS has routinely neglected their fiduciary duties to the FNSA by obfuscating account statements, denying cheque requisitions, and forcing the students who lead the organization to shoulder financial burdens.
- SFSS has demonstrated outright racism in denial of events and responses to FNSA governance initiatives.
Indigenous Peoples are no stranger to institutional prejudice, discrimination, and mismanagement, especially within academic institutions. SFSS has routinely demonstrated a refusal to take their responsibilities seriously with regards to the FNSA while we continued - as students, elders, parents, relatives, and workers - to provide for our membership and community the advocacy and support that we promise to our relations via our constitution.
Our dealings with SFSS is but one example of the asymmetrical distribution of power between institutions and Indigenous students and faculty at SFU. The current SFSS board’s conception of community and inclusivity are based on Eurocentric values and neoliberal governance. These ideologies are violent, oppressive, and exclude Indigenous peoples. SFSS must collectively become allies, rather than opponents, and consider the needs of SFU’s Indigenous students by following these initiatives: 
- Indigenous students, represented by the FNSA, need a space that will support us on our terms. This new space in the SUB building needs to be inclusive, culturally appropriate, and spatially accommodating towards our growing membership.
- FNSA will accept nothing less than dignified, direct consultation between the FNSA and SFSS: leadership to leadership with mutual respect. Direct consultation must centre us in all plans moving forward.
- As Indigenous students, we will not be subjugated to racist attitudes and paternalism.
- As Indigenous students, we need reliable financial security. SFSS needs to be transparent and prompt when dealing with our accounts and funds so that no council member is financially liable.
- As Indigenous Peoples, we will not compromise our rights as outlined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). We expect SFSS to familiarize themselves with those rights, as well as the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).
SFU has a reputation as a progressive institution. The university’s commitment to true reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples is a prime example of such progression. When we see the Aboriginal Reconciliation Council (ARC) and numerous other initiatives and committees happening across the campus, it is apparent that SFU is committed to walking alongside Indigenous students as we strive to decolonize our school; this will make the institution safer, more welcoming, and a place for positive experiences. Although SFSS and SFU are distinct entities, SFSS’s existence is contingent on that of SFU. SFSS’s mandate to represent students should follow SFU’s positive initiatives included in their own mandate. Thus far, there has been a sharp divergence from its parent’s mandate.
If SFSS continues on this path, it will be in violation of their organization’s policies, values, and constitution as they will not provide an appropriate, safe space for First Nations, Métis, and Inuit students here at SFU. We hope that, with public support, this will encourage SFSS to change its behaviour for the better.
All our relations,
The First Nations Student Association"]
0 Comments

Timeline of the Sfss student space crisis

9/20/2018

0 Comments

 
INTRODUCTION
We are representatives of the Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry (SOCA) student group at Simon Fraser University. We are a racialized and equity-seeking group in the Rotunda Community who are advocating for the reconciliation, the redressing of wrongs, social and racial equity though values such as inclusivity, representation, social-justice and community-building.

BACKGROUND ON SOCA
  • Represents the Black Community and allies; provides a safe space for students through our black community services centre which we have occupied since Fall of 1997.
  • Advocated for SFU to hire black professors in 1998
  • Raised awareness about various issues concerning the African Continent and Diaspora.
  • More information can be accessed at sfusoca.ca/about


CONSULTATIONS in 2013/14
After consultations with the BuildSFU project in 2013/14, the SFSS assured the various groups that the process would be smooth and that the groups housed in the rotunda would be allocated space in the organizational suites of the new SUB.

ARCHITECTURAL REPORT
In the architectural report it can explicitly be seen that the rotunda groups are allocated space, alongside other bookable rooms such as the 22 booking rooms that can be found on various other floors of the building. Six rooms were to be allocated for the Rotunda Community and one for the napping room. The 6 groups to be allocated space in the Rotunda are FNSA, SFPIRG, CJSF, SOCA, Women's Centre and Out On Campus.


SFU extended SFSS’s sublease with only one view in mind, that groups, especially SFSS groups housed in the Rotunda would be saved. But for the CEO to communicate in our meeting that SOCA 'just can not have dedicated space' is disingenuous.
News article 2013/14: https://the-peak.ca/2014/05/build-sfu-presents-sub-architectural-designs/

REPORT: http://www.sfusoca.ca/uploads/1/1/8/5/118513699/sfu_sub_architectural_report_dd_small.pdf


Institutional Racism
The term "institutional racism" describes societal patterns that impose oppressive or otherwise negative conditions on identifiable groups on the basis of race or ethnicity. Oppression may come from the government, schools or the court.

Institutional racism shouldn't be confused with individual racism, which is directed against one or a few individuals. It has the potential of negatively affecting people on a large scale, such as if a school refused to accept any African Americans on the basis of color.


SOCA's DUE PROCESS
SOCA has exhausted all available avenues to get our voices heard.

  • In 2013/14 we were a part of the consultation process. However, it appears that this consultation process was just to obtain a wide range of support in order to get the building approved.
  • The Architectural Report released in May 2014 showed 7 organizational suites.
  • Due to the consultation process which we were involved in before, it was assumed that our group would be one of the groups to be allocated space to continue operating our Black Community Services Center.
  • In 2017, we heard that there was a Request for Expression of Interest in SUB spaces. SOCA assumed that this was a formality. Moreover, this Request for Expression of Interest in SUB spaces was issued without first making the groups which were initially consulted with in 2013 aware of the process. Nevertheless,in September 29, 2017 we sent in our Request for Expression of Interest.
  • On November 1, 2017, we got a response saying that the SFSS were 'overwhelmed by responses'. [Obviously people would send out requests if they thought rooms were available]
  • On Dec 1, 2017, we got the following email: After careful consideration, the SFSS Board of Directors has determined that four out of the five available suites in the SUB will be allocated to SFSS clubs and student unions. In the next steps, we will be developing a shared usage model to ensure that clubs and student unions will have the space they need, when they need it. This will allow a larger number of student groups to benefit from designated space than would otherwise be possible, and will ensure that undergraduate students are the primary users of these spaces. Additionally, the SFSS has met with external groups that currently lease space from the SFSS and whose current leases, in some cases, will end next year. We have offered alternate space to most of these groups in other SFSS spaces.
  • As we were concerned and due to the fact that our situation is unique, we also reached out to Hangue Kim, the President of the SFSS at the time, to ensure that there were steps to specifically allocate spaces to the groups in the Rotunda.
  • On March 6, 2018, we took the extra step and again reached out to the President Hangue Kim as the SFSS had still not reached out to the groups that would be affected by their decision. As a response, we were told by Kim that "I have asked staff to get in touch".
  • On March 20, 2018 we were emailed the following:
    I am writing from the SFSS regarding your space and your request for new keys. I apologize for the time that it has taken to respond.

Martin Wyant (SFSS CEO) and I are interested in meeting you to discuss your requests as well as your eventual move-out of your space in the Rotunda.
Would you be able to meet us on Wednesday, April 4th, or Thursday, April 5th, in the morning?
Please let me know ASAP as Martin's calendar fills up quite quickly. We would meet in the Maggie Benston Centre, room 2234.
  • On April 5th, we had a very tumultuous meeting with the CEO and the BuildSFU General Manager - Marc Fontaine. We were being treated as if we were disposable. The CEO had a very condescending attitude. He used divide and conquer tactics were to differentiate the groups in the Rotunda Community, we were spoken down to, other marginalized groups were used as pawns in a plan to get us to be silenced. We were told not to go to The Peak or conversations will be shut down.
Martin's Behaviour in April 5th meeting
  • April 6th, We emailed Martin a synopsis of SOCA and other things agreed to in the previous meeting.  Not only were we ignored, we instead received an Eviction Notice
New Board Elected
  • On May 11, We set up a meeting with VP University Relations Jackson Freedman, VP External Relations Jasdeep Gill, and President Jas Randhawa
  • On May 22, This meeting was much better, we drew up a proposal that we believed would work. Three earmarked groups in one of the organizational suites given to groups a part of the rotunda community and the other remaining organizational suites for PIRG, FNSA, CJSF.
  • On June 12, We sent in this proposal after the meeting. In response we were told that there will be no permanent spaces even though we have been in dialogue with groups. We tried all that we could. Sent out to everybody. Articulated our issues. Everything.
  • We explained what we meant by the permanent/long term dedicated space
  • On June 28, 2018, we went in a clarification meeting with the President. We wanted him to clarify because there were no decisions made, and that their previous emails are conflicting. Also, the President felt offended by Teresa, SOCA and SFPIRG member stating that white people can be a part of SOCA too. We also raised concerns around Martin and the President stated the CEO can have a direct approach
  • On July 3, we got a very shocking email from the SFSS. We were condemned that we were 'hateful, racist or otherwise demeaning'. We were also condemned with the SFSS stating Verbal harassment in the workplace is a serious concern, and any form of threats, bullying, and condescending language is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
  • On July 5, 2018, SOCA clarifies our position stating that we support deconstructing issues and race and clarified the issue and talked about how best to go forward as partners.
  • Then on July 7, SFSS then doubles down stating that this is a 'justification' a minimization and a misappropriation of what occurred.
  • After exhausting all steps we realized that there were no other option but to start reaching out to allies internally and externally letting them know of the situation.
  • That's how it came to us being a full on campaign.
  • On August 24, We sent out a letter of our concerns to the SFSS stating our concerns as well as the Concerns of the board. [Took us over a month to really prepare emotionally and to get ready for verbal and racial attacks and also to be prepared for our explanation of these issues]
  • On Sep 2, We released public statements to SFSS and SFU outlining our concerns and launched a petition.
  • September 14, 2018 met with SFSS to discuss all these concerns in person alongside the other groups in the Rotunda Community.
SOCA's actions in the whole situation
  • We have tried all internal avenues
  • We have been transparent, fully open, sending everything to all board of Directors.
  • We explored every outlet to get our voices heard.
  • SFSS should be representing the students and the actions of the SFSS led us to being vocal
  • We have tried everything to get the SFSS on board and understand.
  • You are representing students, you need to represent students of all race and creed.
  • SFSS needs to understand the specific need of an organizing space, and advocacy space and a support mechanism for the Black Students on this Campus.


SOCA OPEN LETTER TO SFSS
Many groups having concerns:
  • Not limited to our groups but every group having interactions over the last three years have problems with how they have been treated
  • Constant disregard for less powerful groups and the institutional roadblocks you erect for groups that have challenged your decisions
  • We need to continue to have a space that we may continue to raise awareness, and educate the campus community on issues of race, as well as to maintain the fellowship and provide resources and support services that we do as an organization. We call on the well-meaning members of the board to feel free to reach out to have a conversation as to how to respond to persons that are uncomfortable.
  • We implore the board to never condemn people for expressing their concerns, especially concerns from students that have been raised.

We call on the SFSS:
1) To provide an extension to the leases for all Rotunda Groups Spaces
2) To vote to provide spaces for the Rotunda Groups in the Students Union Building
3) If the SFSS refuses to make amends to the situation we call on all board of Directors to apologize and resign due to the embarrassment of the SFSS and this Artificially created SUB Space Crisis.
4) To Remove Martin Wyant as CEO of the SFSS

0 Comments

Joint Statement from SOCA and SFPIRG to the SFSS Board of Directors

9/20/2018

0 Comments

 
September 14th, 2018

Joint Statement from SOCA and SFPIRG to the SFSS Board of Directors


To the SFSS Board of Directors,
Thank you for inviting us to attend your September 14th, 2018, Board of Directors meeting. As student organizations who have been on campus serving students for decades, we appreciate having the opportunity to meet with you to discuss how we can all continue this important work. Before we begin, we would like to highlight a few things as they relate to our ongoing struggle to secure space at SFU.

Issues Addressed in Open Letters

First, our organizations have sent you open letters with regards to our concerns about securing long-term space on campus. These letters have attempted to not only address the serious issue of any of our organizations being displaced by the SFSS, but also the many concerns that have come up over the last few years in our dealings with the SFSS. Some of these concerns include a lack of respect for fellow student organizations, systemic discrimination against marginalized students, and bad faith negotiations with student groups and the University. We would like to be clear that not a single one of our concerns has been addressed by the SFSS Board of Directors, and so the issues raised in our open letters remain outstanding.

SFSS Governance Conflict
Second, we understand that the SFSS is currently in the midst of a governance conflict, wherein allegations have been made against President Jas Randhawa, a motion to impeach him is being brought to the SFSS membership by the SFSS Board of Directors via the upcoming AGM, and counter-motions are being proposed by him to bring forward at an SGM. Some of the counter-motions include moving to provide space in the SUB to the FNSA, SOCA, and SFPIRG.

It appears that both Jas Randhawa and the SFSS Board of Directors have both been using our organizations and our need for long-term, secure space on campus as campaign and messaging tools. Allegations have been made that Jas Randhawa has been attempting to make backroom deals with student groups, promising to provide them with space in the SUB in exchange for their support of his campaign. Very honestly, we have not made any kind of deal or agreement with Jas Randhawa.

We would like to be very clear that our organizations remain committed to transparency and honesty about our negotiations for space on campus, and have sought to deal with the full SFSS Board of Directors at every opportunity possible. We have been nothing but forthright with you about the issues we continue to face, and as we have highlighted in our previous letters to you, we understand that the SFSS Board of Directors, collectively, form the entity who has the power to make any kind of agreement on behalf of the SFSS. This is why we are here to speak with you, and this is why we are holding the full SFSS Board of Directors accountable for your decisions. You are ALL responsible for the imminent displacement of multiple student organizations, and so we are exceptionally displeased by how you have ALL used our ongoing struggle to secure space as a messaging tool in the SFSS governance conflict. Just as we have been clear about what our concerns with the SFSS have been, we kindly ask that you be clear with students about the nature of the ongoing governance conflict at the SFSS.

Respectful Organizational Relationships
Finally, we would like to underscore once again our concern about the approach the SFSS has brought to community-building and organizational relationships. The June 13th letter from the SFSS to SFPIRG, signed by Jas Randhawa, states:
We hope that you come to understand this decision and can find a way moving forward to build a better relationship with the student society that is based on mutual respect and clear communication.

Ironically, this is what we have been asking for from the SFSS, and what the SFSS has yet to demonstrate a willingness to engage in. Tactics of intimidation and coercion have been utilized in dealings with our organizations, such as the imposition of unreasonable deadlines with virtually no notice, and the implicit threat of displacement if we do not move mountains in order to meet your imposed timelines.

We have previously named the extreme power imbalances between our organizations, caused by the disparity in resources available, the SFSS’s comparative ease of access to a relationship with SFU, and the SFSS’s control of campus space for student organizations. Because of all these reasons, we once again had no choice but to act within your timeline when you invited us to this Board meeting with less than 3 days’ notice with very little information about what would be discussed.

We believe that if the SFSS Board of Directors had a genuine interest in working with our organizations to resolve the student space crisis and to address the many issues we have brought up with you, that you would have collaborated with us to find a time that was agreeable for all parties. This is not about personal preference or convenience, this is a matter of mutual respect, compassion, and community-building. This approach to how the SFSS builds relationships has very real impacts on people; for example, one of SFPIRG’s staff members lives with chronic illness, and in order to attend this meeting, was forced to reschedule four medical appointments. The sense that the SFSS would have proceeded with this conversation about student space that we were invited to, with or without us, leaves us concerned about the SFSS’s genuine interest in good faith organizational relationships. We sincerely hope that you reconsider how you approach this work of nurturing student community on campus because, as we hope you have been coming to understand, the SFSS cannot serve students in a silo.

Conclusion
The above issues notwithstanding, we remain hopeful that the student space crisis at SFU can be solved; however, this will require the SFSS Board of Directors to genuinely revisit decisions that have been made about organizational suites in the SUB, subleases in the Rotunda, and organizational relationships with your fellow student groups.
A meaningful step in this direction would be to extend the subleases of all groups currently housed in the Rotunda, allowing them to stay in their spaces until the SUB has been completed. With the recent announcement that the SUB is not projected to be completed until March 2019 at the earliest, there is no reason to impose December 14th, 2018, as an eviction date. We ask you to please extend our current subleases.
Furthermore, we once again implore you to reconsider the shared space model that is being considered for the SUB. This model contradicts the results of BuildSFU’s own consultation process, calling into question whether oversight and stewardship of the multimillion-dollar project has ever been genuine. Students, building architects, and the University were all led to believe for years that the organizational suites in the SUB would become the new homes for the student organizations on campus. Please, please reconsider how you are allocating organizational suites in the SUB.
Students are eager to see this space crisis resolved, so that our organizations can continue to focus on what we do best: serving students.
We hope you’ll work with us to help make that happen.

Sincerely,

The Executive Team Students of Caribbean & African Ancestry (SOCA)

The Board of Directors Simon Fraser Public Interest Research Group (SFPIRG)
0 Comments

New And Continuing members alike, welcome!

9/18/2018

1 Comment

 

https://mailchi.mp/83deb4a1c0b3/new-and-continuing-members-alike-welcome​

1 Comment

SOCA writes COncerns to sfss board of directors

9/13/2018

0 Comments

 
August 24, 2018
Dear SFSS Board of Directors,


It is very disappointing the SFSS Board of Directors is using the 'recent incidents' as a pretext to justify refusing to address the decision of the SFSS to evict SOCA on December 14. It is very unfortunate that we have been met with condemnation due to one of our members stating her discomfort with being challenged. The unfortunate response of the SFSS to bring this simple interaction in official email communication to detract from the actual conversation is disingenuous. We believe that the SFSS has shifted the conversation unnecessarily and a simple interaction is being shaped as much more than what it needs to be. This is a prime example of the SFSS using the power it has to suppress groups that the SFSS is supposed to work in alliance with. A direct example of how to not treat an organization, for example threatening organizations to not go to the Peak or else 'all conversations will be shut down' in addition to just not acting in good faith. This is using the power imbalance and abusing power to ignore the concerns that the many groups are facing. 

This has shown that there is a lack of cultural and racial sensitivity training in dealing with marginalized people and marginalized groups.  These interactions show the lack of respect the SFSS shows to organizations they serve. We believe that the SFSS is not concerned enough with finding a way moving forward, but rather suppressing our representatives.  We also believe the SFSS has also not listened to us regarding our concerns on being treated with disregard and condescension which was shown by the SFSS Administration in a previous meeting. They would not listen to the negative effects of evicting us as a marginalized student group on campus which currently have had space since 1997.  Their responses to our concerns about these meetings were disheartening to say the least. As the President stated, "Our CEO can have a direct approach”, we have become increasingly concerned with how operations are controlled by the CEO within the SFSS. Especially when those operations affect marginalized students. 

There is a growing trend in the SFSS of acting in bad faith, delaying conversations, and not communicating clearly as it relates to groups having issues that require urgent attention. We urge the board members of the Simon Fraser Student Society to engage with the membership, the students, with all organizations which students are members, volunteer in or are a part of. There are various student groups who have been having problems with communication, the transparency and the lack of respect that the Simon Fraser Student Society has been showing to them. We call on all members of the board to take an introspective look with how the board may serve your constituents better and listen to the voices of the different groups. 

We are not pleased with the SFSS's blatant abuse of power, the constant disregard for less powerful groups and the institutional roadblocks you erect for groups that have challenged your decisions. We hope that you do truly understand the need for the Black Community that SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry represent on campus to continue to have a space that we may continue to raise awareness, and educate the campus community on issues of race, as well as to maintain the fellowship and provide resources and support services that we do as an organization. We call on the well-meaning members of the board to feel free to reach out to have a conversation as to how to respond to persons that are uncomfortable. 

We implore the board to never condemn people for expressing their concerns, especially concerns from students that have been raised. Whether it be:
  • Staffing issues arising within the SFSS
  • Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry and the issue of space and racial and cultural insensitivity of the SFSS
  • First Nations Students Association and their concerns of being coerced on finances and space issues by the SFSS as shown in the May 25 Board Minutes that was posted without their consent
  • SFPIRG and their concerns of being under duress by SFSS Administration to sign a lease agreement
  • The Out on Campus Collective and their concerns of being voiceless in helping to shape the direction of the Out on Campus
  • The Women's Collective who have had similar concerns on voicelessness.
  • The Veggie Lunch who have not been engaged in light of the SFSS discussion to renovate the Forum Chambers
  • The Mini Mart in the SFSS who were consulted early on in the BuildSFU that now risks losing space and has communication issues with SFSS
  • Other groups raising a myriad of concerns such as HI5, Embark, CJSF etc. who have had problems with the SFSS recently.

There is a pattern with the lack of communication and an overall shredding of the relationships that SFSS has had with many groups including SOCA over the last three years. We wish the conscience of well-meaning board-members to hold itself to account, to stop being siloed and engage these various groups on the issues, and realize that it's the students who are in charge and you can make the hard decisions to fix these systemic issues.


As such, since the SFSS had postponed the scheduled meeting between SOCA and the SFSS. We hope that you will soon see us as a priority along with other groups losing space instead of the time-sliced shared space model proposed by the CEO and also, address other issues arising with the SFSS as an institution.  

We wish the very best for the remainder of your term on board, and good luck. 


Best, 
The Executive Team,
SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry
0 Comments

SFU SOCA Message to followers and the community

9/4/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Dear SOCA Followers and SFU Community,
It is with sadness that the SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry (SOCA) announces that after many rounds of negotiations with the SFSS over the past year, we are contacting our followers, members and community for support after being neglected by the SFSS Board of Directors. It is heartbreaking, sad and outright unempathetic to the plight of the Black Community that SFU SOCA represents.
SOCA has operated the Black Community Services Centre located in the Rotunda since 1997. This center has been at the heart of our operations and plays a critical part in supporting our ability to provide a home to a continuously marginalized group at the university. 
The SFSS is currently building a new Student Union Building (SUB), and will be giving up its lease on the Rotunda once the SUB is completed. This means that SOCA will need a new home to continue our awesome work of supporting marginalized communities and developing student life on campus.

The action of the SFSS evicting a Black Students Group who have been operating in the TC317 The Black Community Services Centre in the Rotunda for 24 years is a textbook example of institutionalized racism against communities of colour, where new developments render the most marginalized groups homeless.
Here is how you can help SOCA:
1. SHARE THIS POST TO RAISE AWARENESS
2. USE THE HASHTAG #SAVESOCA AND #BLACKSPACESMATTER. MENTION @SFSS1 and @SFU.
3. SIGN THE PETITION HERE: 
https://www.change.org/p/simon-fraser-student-society-stan…/
Come to the Black Community Service Centre in the Rotunda or email sfusoca@gmail.com to get more information on how to #savesoca.

0 Comments
<<Previous

    SOCA

    Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry - Celebrating Oneness Through Diversity

    Archives

    March 2021
    April 2020
    January 2019
    September 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

LOCATION

2022  ©   SFU Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry

"Celebrating Oneness Through Diversity"
SOCA Black Student Support Centre 
​RM 1430 (Student Union Building)
Simon Fraser University
8888 University Drive
Burnaby BC V5A 1S6
Phone: 778-782-7750

Contact Us

SIGN UP
  • Home
  • About SOCA
    • History of SOCA
    • Executive Team >
      • Execs 2021/22
      • Execs 2020/21
      • Execs 2019/20
      • Execs 2018/19
    • Governance >
      • Partnership >
        • SSA Execs 2019/20
        • Agreements with Partners
        • Sub-Associations and Partners >
          • SFU Somali Students Association >
            • SSA Election
          • SFU Nigerian Students Association
          • African Student Association (Partner)
    • Contact Us
  • Gallery
  • Programs & Advocacy
    • Peer Check Program
    • Walk with our Elders
    • Black Study Hall
    • Student Exchange
    • SOCA Events
    • Advocacy & Campaigns
  • Meetings & Events
    • Minutes & Agenda
  • Resources
    • SOCA Black Student Support Centre - SUB 1430
    • SOCA Black Student Support Staff
    • Library
    • Archives >
      • Past Campaigns >
        • Space Campaign Updates
  • Get Involved
    • Sign Up
    • Volunteer
    • Donate to SOCA
    • Election >
      • By-Elections Fall 2022 >
        • Election 2022/23